Joshua Wu discusses the less common torts.
![Share on Facebook Facebook](https://cpd.malaysianbar.org.my/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/48x48/facebook.png)
![Share on Twitter twitter](https://cpd.malaysianbar.org.my/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/48x48/twitter.png)
![Pin it with Pinterest pinterest](https://cpd.malaysianbar.org.my/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/48x48/pinterest.png)
![Share on Linkedin linkedin](https://cpd.malaysianbar.org.my/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/48x48/linkedin.png)
![Share by email mail](https://cpd.malaysianbar.org.my/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/48x48/mail.png)
Looking at the correct test to determine the existence of a duty of care, this article seeks to explore the issue using reference drawn from Singapore and English courts, and a case study from the Federal Court’s judgment that offers an opportunity to re-examine the applicable test under Malaysian law.